ZKsync Jumps After Buterin Backs It: What's the Catch?

Moneropulse 2025-11-04 reads:17

Okay, so Vitalik tweets something nice about ZKsync, and suddenly the ZK token jumps 50%? Give me a break. This ain't organic growth; it's the crypto equivalent of Elon Musk tweeting about Dogecoin and watching the lemmings rush off a cliff.

The "Incorruptible" Narrative

They're pushing this narrative of Ethereum being "incorruptible." Fine, whatever. But let's be real, "incorruptible" doesn't mean "immune to manipulation." It just means the code itself supposedly can't be tampered with. Which is great, in theory. But what about the real-world forces, the whales, the influencers, the… well, Vitalik himself, who can move markets with a single tweet?

The ZKsync post that Vitalik endorsed described Ethereum as “incorruptible.” What does that even mean in practice? Does it mean my grandma can suddenly understand blockchain technology? Does it mean the gas fees are going to magically disappear? No, it doesn't. It's just marketing fluff designed to get the sheep excited.

And offcourse, the sheep did get excited.

Atlas Shrugged (Or Just Shrug-Worthy?)

Then there's this "Atlas upgrade" boasting 30,000 transactions per second and full Ethereum compatibility. Okay, that sounds impressive. But who actually needs 30,000 transactions per second? Are we all suddenly running high-frequency trading algorithms on the blockchain? I mean, maybe some are, but the average user is still struggling to figure out how to swap tokens without losing half their investment to fees.

This Atlas upgrade is supposed to be "institutional-grade," facilitating payments, tokenized assets, and cross-border settlements. Sounds fancy. Sounds like something designed for banks and corporations, not for the little guy who's just trying to buy a cup of coffee with crypto.

ZKsync Jumps After Buterin Backs It: What's the Catch?

And Airbender? Seriously? What is this, a cartoon?

I'm not saying ZKsync is inherently bad. Maybe it's genuinely doing "underrated and valuable work," as Vitalik claims. But the fact that a single tweet can trigger a 50% pump just proves how fragile and easily manipulated this whole ecosystem is. It's less about innovation and more about who's got the biggest megaphone. ZK token jumps 50% after Vitalik Buterin backs ZKsync post

I wonder if Vitalik even realizes the power he wields with these offhand endorsements. Or maybe he does, and that's the problem.

The Price of Influence

Look, I get it. Everyone wants to be relevant. Everyone wants to feel like they're making a difference. But when your words can directly impact people's wallets, you have a responsibility to be a little more careful. A little more… skeptical.

The crypto space is rife with scams and hype, and the last thing we need is influential figures blindly shilling projects without doing their due diligence. Or maybe they are doing their due diligence, and they just have a different definition of "valuable" than I do.

Then again, maybe I'm the crazy one here. Maybe I'm just a bitter old cynic who's missing out on the next big thing. But I've seen this movie before, and it usually ends with a lot of people losing a lot of money.

Another Day, Another Pump-and-Dump?

So, is this Vitalik's ZKsync pump a sign of genuine progress, or just another example of crypto's inherent susceptibility to hype and manipulation? I'm leaning towards the latter. It's a puppet show, plain and simple, and we're all just dancing to the tune of the puppet master.

qrcode